Which factor is NOT considered when proving a suspect's possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute?

Possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute typically involves several key indicators that law enforcement and prosecutors look for to establish intent beyond mere possession. The correct answer highlights that security measures, such as the possession of a police radio scanner, are not a direct factor in proving intent to distribute.

In criminal cases involving controlled substances, the quantity of the substance plays a significant role. A large quantity may suggest that the individual did not simply possess the drug for personal use but rather for distribution purposes. Similarly, the presence of large amounts of cash can indicate that the individual is involved in drug sales, as cash is often the medium of exchange in illicit transactions. Packaging materials are also a strong indicator, as they often point to preparations for distribution rather than personal consumption.

While having a police radio scanner may suggest that a suspect is taking precautions or trying to evade law enforcement, it does not directly demonstrate intent to distribute the controlled substance. Thus, this factor is not typically considered in the legal framework for establishing possession with intent to distribute.